GCOS GOOS WCRP/OOPC IX/3
page 9
dynamics of the shallow and deep overturning cells, of interbasin exchange and the
Antarctic circumpolar current (ACC), and teleconnections with climate variability outside the
region. Coverage of the Southern Ocean by Argo floats has improved dramatically since last
year, though full coverage will not be obtained until observations under sea ice can be
routinely taken. A number of planned and ongoing observing projects have moved forward,
these include the Good Hope project focused on Indo Atlantic exchanges, AnSlope focused
on exchanges at the Antarctic Slope Front, WECCON focused on Weddell Sea convection,
and SAMFLOC focused on deep mixed layer formation processes in the southeast Pacific.
Details of these and other observing programs can be found on the SO Panel s website:
http://www.clivar.org/organization/southern/
. Observational challenges raised at the last
OOPC meeting are for the most part ongoing, apart from the progress with Argo. These
include calibrating surface drifters for the high wind conditions of the SO, enhancing surface
meteorological coverage including into the seasonal sea ice zone and on subantarctic islands
to validate satellite observations, finding champions for surface time series stations,
subsurface monitoring in the sea ice zone, and sea ice monitoring. Further challenges the SO
Panel has identified include the need to encourage the filling of observational gaps, the
extension of Argo into the seasonal sea ice zone, and making sure data from the SO is being
submitted to data centers. The SO panel also sees the IPY as an important opportunity to
enhance the observing system in the polar oceans. It also supports the South Pacific
Workshop proposed by the CLIVAR Pacific panel.
Kevin Speer presented some thinking the SO Panel has done in response to OOPC s
request for climate indices. The presentation is available on the meeting website. Many of the
well known Antarctic climate indices are based on atmospheric data: the Southern Annular
Mode, the Pacific S. American mode, the Antarctic Dipole and Circumpolar Wave. There are
connections with the ENSO pattern, though various studies taking different zones and time
periods show different levels of correlation. Less work has been done on connecting ocean
variability with these atmospheric modes of variability, in large part hampered by a lack of
data. There are hints of covariability between the Antarctic Circumpolar Current, Ekman
transport, and the major atmospheric modes, though these remain unclear. A crucial variable
where available data is sparse is of course the sea ice, and particularly coastal polynas driven
by katabatic winds, which are zones of new ice production and salinification that are
important in driving the deep overturning cell in the SO. The various new process and
sustained studies of the SO will add to the ocean data base and allow more research into the
link between climate variability and the SO variability, but many holes still remain,
particularly in the Pacific sector. Simultaneous transport arrays could reveal internal modes of
ocean variability, and improvements in the measurements of air sea flux fields are crucial in
understanding the coupling between ocean, ice, and atmosphere.
After discussion, the OOPC panel members suggested that the SO Panel (and the other
CLIVAR basin panels) should continue its work in considering ocean indices, try to link these
with wider patterns of climate variability that have societal impact, and as much as possible
document this work. The IPY was again mentioned as a unique opportunity to further the
polar observing network, to prove value for potential transition to sustained status. The
particular lack of observations in the seasonal sea ice zone was noted.
6.
SPONSORS REPORTS AND INTERSESSIONAL ACTIVITIES
The chair presented the activities of the OOPC sponsors. A general presentation on
GCOS, GOOS, and JCOMM by Harrison is available on the meeting website.
<
New Page 1
IX Web Hosting