JSP 375 Vol 2
MoD Health & Safety Handbook
4.2
Modifying the process to eliminate production of a hazardous by product or waste product.
4.3
Substituting the hazardous substance by a new substance which presents no risk or less
risk to health.
5
Examples of prevention/substitution include: asbestos replaced by MMMF; shot blasting using inert
materials rather than sand; mercury gauges replaced by mechanical pressure gauges; detergent
solutions for cleaning instead of organic solvents; water based paints and adhesives rather than those
based on organic solvents; riveting instead of welding; using sealed batteries instead of ones requiring
topping up with acid.
6
Care should be taken that any proposed new process does not introduce new risks or if it does,
that these are less than the original and more easily controlled.
7
Reference should be made to project sponsors as appropriate when attempting to identify suitable
alternative processes or substances. If necessary, feedback should be raised (e.g. in the form of a
defect acquaint ).
LEVEL OF CONTROL OF EXPOSURE
8
If it is not reasonably practicable to prevent exposure to hazardous substances, then it should be
controlled to within the appropriate occupational exposure limits (OELs) published in EH40 (and updated
annually) by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Compliance with these limits demonstrates
adequate control of exposure by inhalation as required by the COSHH Regulations. The absence of a
limit does not mean that the substance is harmless.
9
There are 2 types of OELs; maximum exposure limits (MELs) and occupational exposure
standards (OESs). Both types of limit are concentrations of hazardous substances in the air, averaged
over a specified period of time referred to as a time weighted average (TWA).
Maximum Exposure Limits (MEL)
10 A MEL is set for substances which may cause the most serious health effects, such as cancer and
occupational asthma, and for which safe levels of exposure cannot be determined, or for substances
for which safe levels may exist but control to those levels is not reasonably practicable. Exposure
should be reduced as far below the MEL as reasonably practicable and should not exceed the MEL
when averaged over the specified reference period. For substances given a short term MEL (15 minute
reference period), this level of exposure, averaged over the reference period, should never be
exceeded.
Occupational Exposure Standards (OES)
11 An OES is set at a level at which there is currently no indication of risk to the health of workers
exposed by inhalation day after day. Exposure to a substance with an OES should be reduced to no
higher than that level; if the OES is exceeded, the reason must be identified and measures must be
taken to reduce exposure to the OES as soon as is reasonably practicable.
`Sk' Notation
12 Some substances can pass through the skin, enter the blood stream and cause harm elsewhere in
the body. Substances for which this effect could be significant are given the Sk notation in EH40,
indicating that particular care must be taken to prevent skin contact with them.
Leaflet 5 Annex G
Page 2
April
2003
New Page 1