Appendix A
Scope and Methodology
As background for this audit, we researched and reviewed IT laws,
regulations, and other federal guidance applicable to the EP&R directorate.
We researched and reviewed prior OIG, Government Accountability Office,
and other reports relating to EP&R IT to identify relevant findings and
recommendations. We also reviewed information available on the DHS and
FEMA websites about disaster response and recovery initiatives.
We met with EP&R management officials and staff to review the directorate's
approach to responding to and recovering from terrorist attacks, major
disasters, and other domestic emergencies. These officials discussed EP&R's
organization, roles, responsibilities, operations, and systems for response and
recovery activities. Additionally, these officials discussed EP&R's strategic
planning process and provided copies of DHS, FEMA, and EP&R CIO
strategic, performance, and operational plans. We reviewed the plans to
determine alignment of the various organizations' goals, objectives, and
performance measures.
We visited EP&R field offices and state government organizations to assess
IT user guidance and support. Emergency management officials, IT support
staff, and system users at the following locations discussed the effectiveness
of EP&R's guidance and processes for responding to and recovering from
disaster incidents:
EP&R Headquarters
CIO officials and IT support staff
Mt. Weather personnel
Response Directorate officials
Recovery Directorate officials
FEMA Regions
Region II New York, New York
Region IV Atlanta, Georgia
Region IX Oakland, California
State Emergency Management Organizations
New York Public Security Office and New York State Emergency
Management Office Albany, New York
State Office of Emergency Services Sacramento, California
Georgia Emergency Management Agency Atlanta, Georgia
Maryland Emergency Management Agency Reisterstown, Maryland
State Homeland Security Offices Albany, New York
Emergency Preparedness and Response Could Better Integrate Information Technology
with Incident Response and Recovery
Page 44
New Page 1