[Sme98] A. Smeaton. Independence of contributing retrieval strategies in data fusion for effective 

information retrieval. Proceedings of the 20th BCS IRSG Colloquium. Springer Verlag electronic 

Workshops in Computing. Grenoble. 1998. 

[SJ72] K. Sparck Jones. A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. 

Journal of Documentation. 28. 1. pp 11 20. 1972 

[SJ79] K. Sparck Jones. Search term relevance weighting given little relevance information. Journal of 

Documentation. 35. 1. pp 30  48. 1979. 

[SSJ+00a] K. Sparck Jones, S. Walker and S. E. Robertson. A probabilistic model of information 

retrieval: development and comparative experiments   Part 1. Information Processing and 

Management. 36. 6. pp 779 808. 2000. 

[SSJ+00b] K. Sparck Jones, S. Walker and S. E. Robertson. A probabilistic model of information 

retrieval: development and comparative experiments   Part 2. Information Processing and 

Management. 36. 6. pp 809 840. 2000. 

[SB64] J. Spiegel and E. Bennett. A modified statistical association procedure for automatic document 

content analysis and retrieval. Statistical Association Methods For Mechanized Documentation. 

National Bureau of Standards Miscellaneous Publications 269. (M. E. Stevens, V. E. Guiliano and L. 

B. Heilprin. eds). pp 47 60.  1964. 

[Spi96] A. Spink. Multiple search sessions model of end user behavior: an exploratory study Journal 

of the American Society for Information Science. 47. 8. pp 603 609. 1996. 

[Spi97] A. Spink. Study of interactive feedback during mediated information retrieval. Journal of the 

American Society for Information Science. 48. 5. pp 382 394. 1997. 

[SGB98] A. Spink, H. Greisdorf and J. Bateman. From highly relevant to not relevant: examining 

different regions of relevance. Information Processing and Management. 34. 5. pp 599 621. 1998. 

[SS93] A. Spink, and T. Saracevic. Dynamics of search term selection process in mediated online 

searching. Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 

30. pp 63 72. 1993. 

[SS97] A. Spink and T. Saracevic. Interaction in information retrieval: selection and effectiveness of 

search terms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48. 8. pp 741 761. 1997. 

[SW99] A. Spink, and T. D.  Wilson. Toward a theoretical framework for information retrieval (IR) 

evaluation in an information seeking context. Mira  99: Evaluating Information Retrieval. S. Draper, M. 

Dunlop, I. Ruthven and C. J. van Rijsbergen (eds). electronic Workshops in Computing. 1999. 

[Su94] L. T. Su. The relevance of recall and precision in user evaluation. Journal of the American 

Society for Information Science. 45. 3. pp 207 217. 1994.  

[SYA+98] R. G. Sumner, Jr, K. Yang, R. Akers and W. M. Shaw, Jr. Interactive retrieval using IRIS: 

TREC 6 experiments. Proceedings of the Sixth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC 6). (E.M. Voorhees 

and D. K. Harman eds). NIST special publication 500 240. pp 711 734. 1998. 

[TA88] M. A. Tiamiyu and I. Y. Ajiferuke. A total relevance and document interaction effects model 

for the evaluation of information retrieval processes. Information Processing and Management. 24. 4. 

pp 391 404. 1988. 

[Vak00a] P. Vakkari. Cognition and changes of search terms and tactics during task performance. 

Proceedings of RIAO Conference on Content Based Multimedia Information Access. Paris. pp 894 

907. 2001. 

[Vak00b] P. Vakkari. Relevance and contributing information types of searched documents in task 

performance. Proceedings of the twenty third annual international ACM SIGIR Conference on 

Research and development in information retrieval. pp 2 9. Athens. 2000. 

 52