actions to amend the RKPH, RKL and RKT guidelines to reflect NRMP recommendations 

(NRMP Report Nos. 29 and 42), nor apply the advice provided in working papers discussed with 

the Task Force (Tim Kajian) for improvement of concession planning guidelines.   

The main lessons learned or conclusions from NRMP's assistance with forest concession 

planning guidelines are summarized below: 

The reviewed topics were relevant, and the studies were timely in terms of 

awareness and commitment by PHPA of the MoFr to improve the extent and quality 

of sustainable management practices on forest concessions. 

NRMP assisted both to identify the underlying weaknesses of forest concession 

management and document areas that could be addressed through development 

assistance. 

If implemented with appropriate policy changes, NRMP analyses and 

recommendations could lead to beneficial and measurable improvements in the 

managerial performance of many concession holders. 

NRMP assisted reviews that were beneficial for introducing new ideas about forest 

resources management planning to counterpart officials and concessionaire 

technical staff.  Thus, NRMP's involvement has filled a training role; personnel 

gained new insights and knowledge by association with project activities. 

The  Tim Kajian / Task Force mechanism is effective for encouraging discussion 

among officials on the project reviews, recommendations, and conclusions (NRMP 

No. 52, Bennett 1997). Workshops tended to be less satisfactory.  While both 

mechanisms improved the level of participation, the lack of implementation of NRMP 

recommendations suggested the need for either reformulation or enhancement to 

effect real change.  

Studies produced during several different assignments were an effective means of 

delivering project assistance because study results gave government officials and 

concessionaires time to reflect upon the conclusions and recommendations reported 

at the end of each consultant's visit.  Commitment and support from senior officials in 

DJPH facilitated progress with the reviews. 

Competitive awards for applied research to improve quality and relevance of forestry 

research were very useful (NRMP Report No. 28, Bennett 1997). 

39